In the last module we saw that number theory can be useful for key exchange. In this modlule we will review some basic facts of number theory that will help us build many public key systems next week. As we go through the material in this module it might help to pause the video from time to time to make sure all the examples are clear So as I said we're gonna use number theory to build key exchange protocols. We're gonna use number theory to build digital signatures, public encryption and many, many other things. But before we can do all that, we have to review some basic facts from number theory and in fact in this module we're gonna do a quick course on the relevant concept. If you'd like to review some of the material discussed in this module offline, I referenced at the end of the module a free textbook by Victor Shoup and I pointed to some specific chapters in his book that will explain the materials that we will cover here. So from here on I'm going to use the following notation. I'm going to use capital N to always denote a positive integer, and I'm going to use lower case p to always denote a positive prime number. Now I'd like to introduce the following notation, there's this funny Z that's written like two diagonal lines here with a subscript N I'm gonna use that to denote the sets as zero, one, two, up to N minus one. This is actually a very common notation that's used in Crypto, and so I'll stick to that here. So again, Z sub N denotes the set of integers 0,1 up to N-1. And in fact, this is not just a set of integers. We can do addition and multiplication in this set as long as we always multiply module of the number N. For those of you who know a little bit of algebra, I'll just say that Z sub N denotes a ring where addition and multiplication are done modulo N. This is very common notation in crypto, although in modern mathematics Z sub N sometimes denotes something else. But as I said I'm gonna keep on using Z sub N to denote the set of integers 0 to N-1 with addition and multiplication modulo N. So I want to make sure everybody's comfortable with modular arithmetic. And so let's just look at the number, say, N=12 And let's just see some basic facts about modular arithmetic. So I'm gonna say that nine plus eight is seventeen; seventeen is five modulo twelve, so I'm gonna write that nine plus eight is equal to five in Z 12. Now can someone tell me how much is five times seven in Z12? In other words, how much is modular 12? Well, five times seven is 35. And if you recall, 36 is divisible by 12 So five times seven is really -1 module of 12. 35 is minus one module of twelve. But minus one module of 12 is basically the same as 11, cuz I just add 12 to -1 and I get 11. And the next question is, how much is 5 - 7 seven in the Z12? Well, 5-7 is -2. -2 modulo 12, well, I just add 12 to -2 and I get 10. As a result, we say that 5 - 7 is equal to 10. So again, this is just to make sure everybody is comfortable with this notation of working in Z12. In other words, working in modulo 12. Now, I'd just like to make a general statement that, in fact, arithmetic in ZN, in other words, arithmetic modulo N works just as you would expect. So, for example, all the laws that you know about addition and multiplication work equally well in ZN. For example, the distributive law, X times Y plus Z, is still gonna be equal to X times Y plus X times Z. So many of the things that you know about arithmetic when working over the integers or in the reals, will translate to working in, ZN, namely working modulo N. So the next concept we need is what's called a greatest common divisor, or a GCD. And so suppose they give you two integers X and Y. We say that the GCD of X and Y is basically the greatest common divisor it's the largest number, the largest integer that divides both X and Y. So for example, what is the GCD of 12 and 18? Well the GCD is 6, because 6 divides both 12 and 18, and it's the largest number that divides both 12 and 18. Now there is an important fact about GCD's in particular, if I give you two numbers, two integers X and Y, there will always exist two other integers, I will call them A and B, such that if I look at a times X + B times Y what I get is the GCD of X and Y. In other words the GCD of X and Y is a linear combination of X and Y using the integers A and B. So far let us look at a simple example, here, let's look at the GCD from before, so the integers for the GCD would be 2 times 12 Minus 1 times 18. That's 24 minus 18, which is equal to 6. So the integers A and B in this case would be 2 and -1 But this is just an example, and in fact, these integers, A and B will exist for any integers, X and Y. Now not only do A and B exist, in fact there's a very simple and efficient algorithm to find these integers, to find A and B. The algorithm is what's called the extended Euclidean algorithm. This is actually one of the prettiest algorithms from ancient Greek times, due to Euclid of course. I'm not gonna show you how this algorithm works here, I. It's a fairly simple algorithm. I'll just tell that in fact given X and Y, this algorithm will find A and B in time roughly quadratic in the logarithms of X and Y. We'll come back to that and discuss the, the performance of Euclid's algorithm I have a bit more detail in just a minute. But, for now all we need to know is that A and B can actually be found efficiently. Now, if the GCD of X and Y happens to be 1. In other words, 1 is the largest integer that divides both X and Y, then we say that X and Y are relatively prime. For example, the GCD of three and five, it's not difficult to see that it hap, that happens to be 1, Because both 3 and 5 are prime. The next topic we need to talk about is modulated inversion. So other than rationals we know what the inverse of a number is. In other words if I give you the number 2 the inverse of 2 is simply the fraction one half. the qestion is what about inverses when we, we work module N. Well, so the inverse of an element X in Z N is simply another element Y in Z N such that X times Y is equal to 1 in Z N. In other words X times Y is equal to 1 modulo N. And this number Y is denoted by X inverse. And it's not difficult to see that if, if Y exists, then in fact it's unique. And as I said, we'll use X inverse to denote the inverse of X. So let's look at a quick example. Suppose N is some odd integer, and I ask you what is the inverse of 2 in ZN? So it's not too difficult to see that the inverse of two in ZN in fact is N plus one over 2 and you can see that this is an integer because N is odd, therefore, N+1 is even and, therefore, (N+1)/2 is in fact an integer and the range 1..N as required. Now why is (N+1)/2 the inverse of two? Well, let's just multiply the 2 so we do 2 times (N+1) over 2 and what do we get? Well, that's simply equal to N+1 and N+1 is simply equal to 1 in ZN. So since their product is equal to 1. We know that (N+1)/2 is the inverse of 2 in ZN. Now we understand what a modular inverse is, the question is which elements actually have an inverse in ZN? And so there's a very simple lemma that says that if for an element X in ZN, that element has an inverse if and only if it is relatively prime to the modulus N, to the number N. So I'll say that again. X and ZN is invertible if and only if X is relatively prime to N. And let's quickly prove that. It's actually fairly simple to see. So suppose a GCD of X and N happens to be equal to one. So X is relatively prime to N. Well, by this property of GCD as we know that there exists integers A and B. Such that A times X plus B times N is equal to the GCD of X and N, which happens to be one. So A times X plus B times N is equal to 1. Now we can actually take this equation here and, and us it reduce it's modulo N. So what this means is that a times X is equal to one in Z, N. Once we reduce this equation modulo N this term simply falls off because B times N is divisible by N and therefore is 0 modulo N. But what we just showed is that in fact X inverse is simply A in ZN. So because X is relatively prime to N, we were able to show that X is invertible by actually building the inverse of X modulo N Now what about the other direction? What happens if the GCD is greater than 1? Then we want to show that there is no inverse. But that's actually very easy to see because in this case, if you claim that A happens to be the inverse of X modulo N, well, let's look at a<i>x; a<i>X we know should be equal to 1 modulo N</i></i> But if the GCD(X,N) is bigger than 1, then the GCD(a<i>X,N)</i> is bigger than one. But, if the GCD of A times X and N is bigger than 1, then it's not possible that A<i>X is equal to 1. So A<i>X must also be</i></i> bigger than 1, and therefore, A cannot be the inverse of X module N. So this proves that, in fact, in, when the GCD is greater than 1, X cannot have an inverse, because there is no A, such that A times X is equal to one modulo N And this might be a bit confusing, so you might be best just to, do an example. So let's look at, let's suppose that the GCD of X and N happens to be equal to 2. I claim that X is therefore, is not invertible modular N. Well, why is that true? Well, for all A, we know that A times X is gonna be even, is even. And the reason we know that is because, well, 2 divides X and 2 divides N. Well, since two divide X, 2 is also gonna divide A times X. And therefore, A times X must be even. But what that means is that there's no way that A times X is equal to 1 modulo N In particular, there's no way that A times X is equal to B times N + 1 This simply can't happen, this equality must not hold. Because this side happens to be even, as we said. B times N for exactly the same reason is also even: N is divisible by two; therefore B times N is also divisible by two. So therefore B times N+1 is odd. And since even can't equal to odd, it's not possible that A times X is equal to some multiple of N+1. And in particular this means that A cannot be the inverse of X because A times X cannot be 1 mod N so X is not invertible modular N. So now we have a complete understanding of what are the invertible elements. Basically, we know that an element is invertible if and only if it's relatively prime to N. And what I like about this proof is I would say this is what's called a computer-science proof In the sense that not only does it prove to you that the inverse exists; it also shows you how to efficiently calculate the inverse. And the way we calculate the inverse, is basically by using this extending decreasing algorithm. Define the numbers A and B. And once we found the numbers A and B, we done because A is the inverse of X. And the numbers A and B can be found very efficiently. So along the way I've also shown you an algorithm for inverting elements, modulo N. Okay. So bear with me, and let's introduce this little more notation. So we're gonna denote by ZN as the set of invertible elements in Z N. In other words, ZN is the set of all elements in ZN such that GCD(X,N)=1 Okay. But I want you, again, to think of ZN as basically those elements in ZN that have an inverse. So let's look at a few examples. So let's start with a prime p. We know that of the integers from zero to p-1, all of them are gonna be relatively primed to p except one integer--namely, the integer 0. Zero is not relatively primed to P, because the GCD(p,0)=0, not 1. So therefore, if p is a prime, the set ZP is simply ZP minus 0, Which means that everything in Z<u>P is invertible</u> except for 0. So if you like the size of ZP<i>, it's simply P-1. Now</i> let's look at our favorite integer again. So why don't you tell me what is Z12 what is the set of invertible elements modulo 12? And the answer, of course, is all the numbers that are relatively primed to 12--namely, 1, 5, 7, and 11. So, for example, 3, 4, 6--all of those are not invertible because they all have a, a non-trivial GCD with twelve, And as we said before, if I give you an element X and ZN<i>, you can find its inverse</i> using the extended Euclidean algorithm. You can find its inverse very efficiently, in fact, using this algorithm. So what we just learned is basically how to solve modular linear equations. In other words, if I give you a linear equation and I ask you to solve it mod N, it's actually very easy to do. All you do is you move B to the other side so you have a minus B, and then you multiply by A inverse. So the answer is minus B times A inverse. And you can find A inverse using the Euclidean algorithm. And once you have a inverse, you'd simply multiply it by minus B, modulo N, and that gives you the solution to this linear equation. Now the Euclidian algorithm actually takes time that's quadratic in logarithm of N. So it takes time proportional to log squared N. And as a result we say that this is a quadratic algorithm for solving linear equations, modulo N, and if fact this is the best know algorithm. And so if you think back to your high-school algebra days, after you learned how to solve linear equations, the next question was, well, what about quadratic equations. And that problem is actually quite interesting, and we're gonna see that in the next few segments.
